<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is There a Philologist in the House?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dwyeropolis.com/2008/05/07/is-there-a-philologist-in-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dwyeropolis.com/2008/05/07/is-there-a-philologist-in-the-house/</link>
	<description>Love = Drool</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:36:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Snead</title>
		<link>http://dwyeropolis.com/2008/05/07/is-there-a-philologist-in-the-house/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Snead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwyeropolis.wordpress.com/?p=101#comment-342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably same source as &quot;uh,&quot; and &quot;like.&quot;

As in &quot;chercher le . e . e . e . e, er, mot juste.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably same source as &#8220;uh,&#8221; and &#8220;like.&#8221;</p>
<p>As in &#8220;chercher le . e . e . e . e, er, mot juste.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus</title>
		<link>http://dwyeropolis.com/2008/05/07/is-there-a-philologist-in-the-house/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwyeropolis.wordpress.com/?p=101#comment-324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Michael.  That was kind of what I figured.  I wonder what other syntactic cross-pollination happened between Latin and the barbarian tongues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Michael.  That was kind of what I figured.  I wonder what other syntactic cross-pollination happened between Latin and the barbarian tongues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bates</title>
		<link>http://dwyeropolis.com/2008/05/07/is-there-a-philologist-in-the-house/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Bates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dwyeropolis.wordpress.com/?p=101#comment-323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I seem to recall reading or hearing that Latin&#039;s demonstrative pronoun &lt;em&gt;ille, illa, illud&lt;/em&gt; (that) was the source for Romance language definite articles. &lt;em&gt;ille&lt;/em&gt; becomes &lt;em&gt;il, el, le&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;illa&lt;/em&gt; becomes &lt;em&gt;la&lt;/em&gt;. The number one (&lt;em&gt;unus, -a, -um&lt;/em&gt;) turned into the indefinite article (e.g., &lt;em&gt;un, une&lt;/em&gt; in French).

Perhaps the newly-Latin-speaking barbarians were accustomed to articles in their own languages and appropriated &lt;em&gt;ille&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;unus&lt;/em&gt; to fill the gap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall reading or hearing that Latin&#8217;s demonstrative pronoun <em>ille, illa, illud</em> (that) was the source for Romance language definite articles. <em>ille</em> becomes <em>il, el, le</em>, <em>illa</em> becomes <em>la</em>. The number one (<em>unus, -a, -um</em>) turned into the indefinite article (e.g., <em>un, une</em> in French).</p>
<p>Perhaps the newly-Latin-speaking barbarians were accustomed to articles in their own languages and appropriated <em>ille</em> and <em>unus</em> to fill the gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

